<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Brett Favre Needs to Come to Minnesota</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesportsgeeks.com/2009/06/24/why-brett-favre-needs-to-come-to-minnesota/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesportsgeeks.com/2009/06/24/why-brett-favre-needs-to-come-to-minnesota/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:38:50 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sandmann5502</title>
		<link>http://thesportsgeeks.com/2009/06/24/why-brett-favre-needs-to-come-to-minnesota/comment-page-1/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>sandmann5502</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesportsgeeks.com/?p=152#comment-440</guid>
		<description>My money&#039;s on Vinny Testaverde ;)  I agree with Pat&#039;s comments if the Vikings are simply looking to be an immediate deep playoff or Super Bowl contender.  John Elway had the same surgery and won his super bowls after it.  A very relevant commonality between Elway&#039;s team and a Favre-clad Vikings team is that they both had solid running games and superior defenses.  This takes wear off of the QB&#039;s arm and allows a cool, decision making QB to provide all of the missing elements (leadership, experience, maturity, etc.).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The problem is that if the Favre gamble fails, you&#039;ve now lost your best window for growing a QB with a developing team.  The Vikings are the petri dish of the NFL right now.  They are all growing off of and with one another.  A solid, developing QB could coalesce this team into a fully functioning unit for the next 5-6 years.  If they take the &quot;must win playoff games now&quot; mentality and it backfires, not only do they have to start the growing process all over again, but the newly tenured superstars are likely to start looking for greener pastures.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was secretly crossing my fingers to see Favre in a purple jersey, but am now glad that we can continue looking towards the future at this point.  Is that future Tavaris?  I don&#039;t believe so, but am naively optimistic that the administration will figure something out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My money&#39;s on Vinny Testaverde <img src='http://thesportsgeeks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   I agree with Pat&#39;s comments if the Vikings are simply looking to be an immediate deep playoff or Super Bowl contender.  John Elway had the same surgery and won his super bowls after it.  A very relevant commonality between Elway&#39;s team and a Favre-clad Vikings team is that they both had solid running games and superior defenses.  This takes wear off of the QB&#39;s arm and allows a cool, decision making QB to provide all of the missing elements (leadership, experience, maturity, etc.).</p>
<p>The problem is that if the Favre gamble fails, you&#39;ve now lost your best window for growing a QB with a developing team.  The Vikings are the petri dish of the NFL right now.  They are all growing off of and with one another.  A solid, developing QB could coalesce this team into a fully functioning unit for the next 5-6 years.  If they take the &#8220;must win playoff games now&#8221; mentality and it backfires, not only do they have to start the growing process all over again, but the newly tenured superstars are likely to start looking for greener pastures.</p>
<p>I was secretly crossing my fingers to see Favre in a purple jersey, but am now glad that we can continue looking towards the future at this point.  Is that future Tavaris?  I don&#39;t believe so, but am naively optimistic that the administration will figure something out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandmann5502</title>
		<link>http://thesportsgeeks.com/2009/06/24/why-brett-favre-needs-to-come-to-minnesota/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>sandmann5502</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesportsgeeks.com/?p=152#comment-194</guid>
		<description>My money&#039;s on Vinny Testaverde ;)  I agree with Pat&#039;s comments if the Vikings are simply looking to be an immediate deep playoff or Super Bowl contender.  John Elway had the same surgery and won his super bowls after it.  A very relevant commonality between Elway&#039;s team and a Favre-clad Vikings team is that they both had solid running games and superior defenses.  This takes wear off of the QB&#039;s arm and allows a cool, decision making QB to provide all of the missing elements (leadership, experience, maturity, etc.).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The problem is that if the Favre gamble fails, you&#039;ve now lost your best window for growing a QB with a developing team.  The Vikings are the petri dish of the NFL right now.  They are all growing off of and with one another.  A solid, developing QB could coalesce this team into a fully functioning unit for the next 5-6 years.  If they take the &quot;must win playoff games now&quot; mentality and it backfires, not only do they have to start the growing process all over again, but the newly tenured superstars are likely to start looking for greener pastures.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was secretly crossing my fingers to see Favre in a purple jersey, but am now glad that we can continue looking towards the future at this point.  Is that future Tavaris?  I don&#039;t believe so, but am naively optimistic that the administration will figure something out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My money&#39;s on Vinny Testaverde <img src='http://thesportsgeeks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   I agree with Pat&#39;s comments if the Vikings are simply looking to be an immediate deep playoff or Super Bowl contender.  John Elway had the same surgery and won his super bowls after it.  A very relevant commonality between Elway&#39;s team and a Favre-clad Vikings team is that they both had solid running games and superior defenses.  This takes wear off of the QB&#39;s arm and allows a cool, decision making QB to provide all of the missing elements (leadership, experience, maturity, etc.).</p>
<p>The problem is that if the Favre gamble fails, you&#39;ve now lost your best window for growing a QB with a developing team.  The Vikings are the petri dish of the NFL right now.  They are all growing off of and with one another.  A solid, developing QB could coalesce this team into a fully functioning unit for the next 5-6 years.  If they take the &#8220;must win playoff games now&#8221; mentality and it backfires, not only do they have to start the growing process all over again, but the newly tenured superstars are likely to start looking for greener pastures.</p>
<p>I was secretly crossing my fingers to see Favre in a purple jersey, but am now glad that we can continue looking towards the future at this point.  Is that future Tavaris?  I don&#39;t believe so, but am naively optimistic that the administration will figure something out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Lussenhop</title>
		<link>http://thesportsgeeks.com/2009/06/24/why-brett-favre-needs-to-come-to-minnesota/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Lussenhop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesportsgeeks.com/?p=152#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I sort of &quot;dig&quot; what you are saying as far as Favre being somewhat of a rouge, but to say his entire career was based on &quot;god-help-us&quot; throws is a bit ridiculous.  Does he gamble?  Yes.  Does he make some ill advised throws? Yes.  But these are not all lucky throws, you don&#039;t put up the stats he did on hopes and prayers...you just don&#039;t.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m not a huge Childress fan, but he&#039;s given Jackson his chances and the only area Jackson has been consistent on is his inconsistency.  If he was a horrible coach, his defense wouldn&#039;t be as good as it is and neither would the run game.  The problem lies at the quarterback position.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think there were better options than Favre the Vikings should have pursued, but those options are gone.  The NFL has such a short window of time for players to remain dominant (there are obviously exceptions) and if the Vikings were rebuilding, I&#039;d say go ahead and give Jackson and Booty their shot.  The Vikings, however, are not rebuilding.  They are a Super Bowl contender with a quarterback and to go into the season with 4 unproven QBs on the roster is not a smart move, its a waste of the talent they possess at other positions.  Maybe Favre will fall flat on his face and tank horribly....it could happen.  But I think there is a better chance of him leading the Vikings to the playoffs than any other QB on the roster currently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sort of &#8220;dig&#8221; what you are saying as far as Favre being somewhat of a rouge, but to say his entire career was based on &#8220;god-help-us&#8221; throws is a bit ridiculous.  Does he gamble?  Yes.  Does he make some ill advised throws? Yes.  But these are not all lucky throws, you don&#39;t put up the stats he did on hopes and prayers&#8230;you just don&#39;t.  </p>
<p>I&#39;m not a huge Childress fan, but he&#39;s given Jackson his chances and the only area Jackson has been consistent on is his inconsistency.  If he was a horrible coach, his defense wouldn&#39;t be as good as it is and neither would the run game.  The problem lies at the quarterback position.  </p>
<p>I think there were better options than Favre the Vikings should have pursued, but those options are gone.  The NFL has such a short window of time for players to remain dominant (there are obviously exceptions) and if the Vikings were rebuilding, I&#39;d say go ahead and give Jackson and Booty their shot.  The Vikings, however, are not rebuilding.  They are a Super Bowl contender with a quarterback and to go into the season with 4 unproven QBs on the roster is not a smart move, its a waste of the talent they possess at other positions.  Maybe Favre will fall flat on his face and tank horribly&#8230;.it could happen.  But I think there is a better chance of him leading the Vikings to the playoffs than any other QB on the roster currently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Subway Scriptures</title>
		<link>http://thesportsgeeks.com/2009/06/24/why-brett-favre-needs-to-come-to-minnesota/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Subway Scriptures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesportsgeeks.com/?p=152#comment-52</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no reason Minnesota needs Brett Favre. You&#039;d think people would have realized this by now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The surgery Favre is recovering from is a huge red flag, having NEVER had on his throwing arm before. As a gunslinger, you live and die by the heat in your arm, and if you can&#039;t trust or don&#039;t know how your arm will be (which Favre doesn&#039;t) you won&#039;t last long.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We know Favre is better suited as a game manager now, but he has never been/will never be a game manager. Favre built his entire HOF career on risky, god-help-us throws. And considering how cocky and talented Favre has been in the past, the Vikes are much better suited trying to mold Sage or Tavaris into that manager, and not Favre.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obviously Favre will sell tickets and jerseys. But winning ball games and going deep into the playoffs will, too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Players like John David Booty and Tavaris would probably appreciate not trying to &quot;learn&quot; from Brett Favre. Favre never has been the player to coach the young up-and-comers. Quite frankly, what would he teach them? Favre was never a &quot;coach&#039;s quarterback&quot;, always took risks, and was only successful because of his blessed arm strength. JDB and Tavaris certainly don&#039;t have that same talent. Oh, and you&#039;re forgetting that Favre never actually taught any of his predecessors, like Aaron Rodgers or (briefly) Kellen Clemens.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is the same logic the Jets employed last year. They though Pennington wasn&#039;t good enough to get the job done. Turns out, it was the coaches who weren&#039;t good enough, and Pennington become a playoff quarterback in Miami. So instead of encouraging the Vikes to cut their loses in the Tavaris Jackson-era, how about they take some time to actually coach and develop a player? Ya dig?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#39;s no reason Minnesota needs Brett Favre. You&#39;d think people would have realized this by now.</p>
<p>The surgery Favre is recovering from is a huge red flag, having NEVER had on his throwing arm before. As a gunslinger, you live and die by the heat in your arm, and if you can&#39;t trust or don&#39;t know how your arm will be (which Favre doesn&#39;t) you won&#39;t last long.</p>
<p>We know Favre is better suited as a game manager now, but he has never been/will never be a game manager. Favre built his entire HOF career on risky, god-help-us throws. And considering how cocky and talented Favre has been in the past, the Vikes are much better suited trying to mold Sage or Tavaris into that manager, and not Favre.</p>
<p>Obviously Favre will sell tickets and jerseys. But winning ball games and going deep into the playoffs will, too.</p>
<p>Players like John David Booty and Tavaris would probably appreciate not trying to &#8220;learn&#8221; from Brett Favre. Favre never has been the player to coach the young up-and-comers. Quite frankly, what would he teach them? Favre was never a &#8220;coach&#39;s quarterback&#8221;, always took risks, and was only successful because of his blessed arm strength. JDB and Tavaris certainly don&#39;t have that same talent. Oh, and you&#39;re forgetting that Favre never actually taught any of his predecessors, like Aaron Rodgers or (briefly) Kellen Clemens.</p>
<p>This is the same logic the Jets employed last year. They though Pennington wasn&#39;t good enough to get the job done. Turns out, it was the coaches who weren&#39;t good enough, and Pennington become a playoff quarterback in Miami. So instead of encouraging the Vikes to cut their loses in the Tavaris Jackson-era, how about they take some time to actually coach and develop a player? Ya dig?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
